betterment of mankind, without the use of 'value' for goods or services, all of mankind would prosper. Some people say; 'I'm not working to support some deadbeat who will not work, why should I?' After a few generations of no monetary reward for services or goods, there would be very few who would not contribute to the welfare of the whole of society.
Many in today's world, say that such a system as Pantheism is no more than Socialism and such a system does not work, look at the former Soviet Union for example. The former Soviet Union is actually a very poor example for Socialism (or Pantheism). The corrupt government of the Soviet Union was led by dictatorship, the corrupt leaders were driven by the capitalism of western governments in which money was the driving force. The leaders of the former USSR did not 'share' with their people the bounty of the tribe, but rather treated their constituents as slave labor and hoarded the wealth accumulated to compete with the western countries in an arms race.
I am not ignorant enough to think this system will work overnight, it will probably take several generations to get everyone on board and weed out the 'deadbeats'. As a new generation is brought into this world, fewer and fewer will not want to contribute to society, after all, this life style will be all they have ever known since birth. There was no currency when they were born, all they have ever learned since birth is that they are a part of society as a whole and their contribution to society is what is expected of them.
The bad habits and lifestyle of today's world would diminish with each succeeding generation. As I told you earlier, the Zoitoids and their Pantheistic society has a few 'deadbeats', even after billions of years, but because of the Zoitoid's compassion for their fellow Beings, these few are still cared for by their society.
If the world did not revolve around currency or precious metals, crime would almost disappear. Ninety five percent of all crime in the world today is because of the want for wealth. There would be no reason to kill a store keeper to steal 'money' or the goods in the store, there would be no currency, the goods in the store are for all as needed!
It will not be easy for the population of this world to distance himself from the want of greed and material possessions, especially by the ones who have monetary wealth and power now. It will only take one country able to be self sufficient (food, water, shelter, manufacturing) to start the change. The people who make electricity still make electricity, the people who build houses still build houses, the people who grow food still grow food etc. Any work that is hazardous to mankind and needed for society to progress can be accomplished by robotics.
The untold wealth of going money-less is almost endless No more starving, no one having to live homeless, great advances in civil infrastructure, good education for all people, not to mention the almost disappearance of crime. As stated, 95% of all crime is because of want for wealth. The supply of illicit drugs would all but disappear, if there is no incentive (monetary reward) to supply illicit drugs, there would be no drug dealers or cartels, no murders over drugs or the money illicit drugs create.
With the drug supply mostly gone there would be few drug addicts. I am willing to concede there will still be organic drugs (marijuana, psychedelic mushrooms etc) but nowhere near the scale of their preponderance of today. The only people who would cultivate these plants would be the small amount of drug users left in the world. Alcohol kills fifty times as many people as drugs do every year. Having said that, I am not proposing the restriction of drugs or alcohol, I am merely pointing out the fact that their use will diminish over the years as society changes.
Currently there is a push to legalize illicit drug use in the United States, particularly marijuana. As of this writing, thirteen states allow the use of marijuana for 'medicinal' purposes. The thirteen states allow a person (with a doctor’s recommendation) to either cultivate an X number of plants or obtain marijuana from a licensed distributor. Marijuana has been shown to lessen the side effects of chemotherapy on individuals with cancer, among other medical benefits. Most individual's though, obtain marijuana for recreational drug use and the preponderance for crimes of a violent nature are much less with marijuana use than those who abuse alcohol.
The Netherlands and Portugal have decriminalized all drug use and crimes have gone down significantly since doing so. Instead of locking up tens of thousands of drug users, these individuals are offered drug counseling instead. You would think the number of heroin addicts would skyrocket, but the opposite is true.
The Number of 'hard drug' addicts has actually gone down tremendously in the Netherlands and Portugal compared to the United States. If you ask the average person on the street if they would use heroin or cocaine if it were no longer illegal, the vast number say; no. The people who mostly use hard drugs are the current addicts, the average person (who can obtain any drug now on the street) has no interest in using a 'hard drug'. It should be absolutely obvious to any person of average intelligence that prosecuting and locking up an individual for drug use or possession only puts a burden on society and destroys lives.
The major crimes left in the world (5%) would be; crimes of passion, sexual crimes, and the occasional 'nut case'. But even these crimes would be of a much lesser abundance because of the changing society.
If the population was not dependent on a perceived value for everything, great advances in the sciences and mankind's existence as a society would prosper a hundred fold. Students would learn more because the teachers want the students to learn, the teachers are not just putting in their time till retirement, it is their contribution to society, what they can take pride in doing. Medical research would not be limited by a lack of money, great advances in the treatment and cure of diseases would be facilitated. Advancements in the sciences and space exploration would have no limits. If mankind does last long enough (not go extinct) to learn the 'secret' of interstellar travel, do you think there is going to be an 'alien' Being out there asking for a 'toll' to cross the stars?
There is no down side to going money-less, the only objector's to this type of society would be the ones now in power and the wealthy who are not willing to forfeit their control and power. Life on this planet can change for the better for all of society, but the change has to start somewhere, soon!
ET's UFO's & GHOST
Now that you have an understanding of the different Entities throughout the Universe, we can discuss the phenomenon of UFO sightings on this world. Most people of this world believe the UFO observances are a new or modern day phenomenon, but in actuality UFO depictions have existed since man first drew pictures on cave walls.
Many paintings of early centuries depicted 'unusual' objects or Beings in the sky. One very early painting of the 'Madonna', actually had a very distinct flying saucer in the upper right side of the painting. Throughout mankind's recorded history, there have been reports of unexplainable objects in the 'heavens' and of 'gods' coming down to Earth in flying craft. The heavens were that part above the Earth's surface that was unattainable to early mankind on the ground, thus the origin of the word 'Heaven'.
Many of the early cave drawings (petroglyphs) depicted 'Beings' that did not look like Beings of this Earth. The depictions of these Beings were usually referred to as 'gods', because there was no other explanation for these strange looking Beings with seemingly unimaginable powers. They must truly be 'gods', the very thought of a mere mortal Being flying through the heavens was incomprehensible to early mankind. Early religion's gods were partly based on these Beings and this perception continues today. Whether you want to believe it or not, almost all accounts of 'gods' or 'angles' attributable to most religions are actually that of encounters with extraterrestrials who descended from the 'heavens', or the Eternals via a NDE.
Thinking along the same lines, consider why and how similar pyramids were constructed in different parts of the world by isolated societies. How is it possible for people of different cultures and physically isolated regions of the planet, to be able to acquire this s
ame knowledge in the same time period? During the time period when the pyramids were constructed, mankind had not yet been able to explore beyond his local continent, yet from the African continent to the Americas, the same type of knowledge and construction was taking place.
Some of today's world say that it would have been possible for early Man to construct these pyramids. Their explanation is that thousands of slaves not only carved these almost perfect pieces, but moved these blocks, some 100 tons or more, at distances of up to sixty miles. Do the math, these 'slaves' would still be moving these blocks today and most pyramids would only be half done! The people who propose that early Man constructed these pyramids though, cannot say how isolated societies all had the same construction techniques at the same time!
The plains of Peru are home of one of the most bazaar accomplishments of early Man. Designs of animals and possibly extraterrestrial Beings are laid out in the arid soil, stretching as far as twenty miles across the arid land and mountains. The design's depictions are only visible from altitude, although they are perfectly laid out on the landscape. How were these