Man thinks, though he’s of flesh … sleeps as an animal sleeps, devours other flesh, defecates, rots, dies …. He spawns his young in an unmechanical manner, although his young are sentient …. He kills … he kills … he overpowers robots, dismantles them, and does monstrous things (what?) with their parts …. He can be killed, permanently, only with a wooden implement … and if killed in any other manner, he does not die a true death, but at once springs up elsewhere in a new body ….
As the monster swung his club, Curanov rolled, rose, and struck out with his long-fingered hand.
The man’s face tore, gave blood.
The demon stepped back, bewildered.
Curanov’s terror had changed into rage. He stepped forward and struck out again. And again. Flailing with all his reduced strength, he broke the demon’s body, temporarily killed it, leaving the snow spattered with blood.
Turning from his own assailant, he moved on the beast that was after Steffan. Clubbing it from behind, he broke its neck with one blow of his steel hand.
By the time Curanov reached Tuttle and dispatched the third demon, Tuttle had sustained one totally demolished arm, another smashed hand, and damage to the ring cable that, luckily, had not terminated him. With any luck, the three robots would survive.
“I thought I was finished,” Tuttle said.
Dazed, Steffan said to Curanov, “You killed all three of them!”
“They would have terminated us,” Curanov said. Inside, where they could not see, he was in turmoil.
Steffan said, “But the prime directive from the Central Agency forbids the taking of life-“
“Not quite,” Curanov disagreed. “It forbids the taking of life which cannot be restored. Which cannot be restored.”
“These lives will be restored?” Steffan asked, looking at the hideous corpses, unable to understand.
“You’ve seen human beings now,” Curanov said. “Do you believe the myths—or do you still scoff?”
“How can I scoff?”
“Then,” Curanov said, “if you believe that such demons exist, you must believe what else is said of them.” He quoted his own store of data on the subject: “If killed in any other way, by any means other than wood, the man will only appear to be dead. In reality, the moment he drops before his assailant, he springs at once to life elsewhere, unharmed, in a new body.”
Steffan nodded, unwilling to argue the point.
Tuttle said, “What now?”
“We continue back to Walker’s Watch,” Curanov said.
“And tell them what we found?”
“No.”
“But,” Tuttle said, “we can lead them back here, show them these carcasses.”
“Look around you,” Curanov said. “Other demons are watching from the trees.”
A dozen hateful white faces could be seen, leering.
Curanov said, “I don’t think they’ll attack us again. They’ve seen what we can do, how we have learned that, with them, the prime directive does not apply. But they’re sure to remove and bury the bodies when we’ve gone.”
“We can take a carcass along with us,” Tuttle said.
Curanov said, “No. Both of your hands are useless. Steffan’s right arm is uncontrollable. I couldn’t carry one of those bodies all by myself as far as Walker’s Watch, not with my power as reduced as it is.”
“Then,” Tuttle said, “we still won’t tell anyone about what we’ve seen up here?”
“We can’t afford to, if we ever want to be promoted,” Curanov said. “Our only hope is to spend a long time in some inactivation nook, contemplating until we’ve learned to cope with what we’ve witnessed.”
They picked their torches out of the snow and, staying close to one another, started down toward the valley once more.
“Walk slowly and show no fear,” Curanov warned.
They walked slowly, but each was certain that his fear was evident to the unearthly creatures crouching in the shadows beneath the pine trees.
They walked all that long night and most of the following day before they reached the station house at Walker’s Watch. In that time, the storm died out. The landscape was serene, white, peaceful. Surveying the rolling snowfields, one felt sure that the universe was rational. But Curanov was haunted by one icy realization: If he must believe in specters and other worldly beings like men, then he would never again be able to think of the universe in rational terms.
TWILIGHT OF THE DAWN
SOMETIMES YOU CAN BE THE BIGGEST JACKASS WHO EVER LIVED,” MY wife said the night that I took Santa Claus away from my son.
We were in bed, but she was clearly not in the mood for either sleep or romance.
Her voice was sharp, scornful. “What a terrible thing to do to a little boy.”
“He’s seven years old-“
“He’s a little boy,” Ellen said harshly, though we rarely spoke to each other in anger. For the most part ours was a happy, peaceful marriage.
We lay in silence. The drapes were drawn back from the French doors that opened onto the second-floor balcony, so the bedroom was limned by ash-pale moonlight. Even in that dim glow, even though Ellen was cloaked in blankets, her anger was apparent in the tense, angular position in which she pretended to seek sleep.
Finally she said, “Pete, you used a sledgehammer to shatter a little boy’s fragile fantasy, a harmless fantasy, all because of your obsession with-“
“It wasn’t harmless,” I said patiently. “And I don’t have an obsession.”
“Yes, you do,” she insisted.
“I simply believe in rational-“
“Oh, shut up.”
“Won’t you even talk to me about it?”
“No. It’s pointless.”
I sighed. “I love you, Ellen.”
She was silent a long while.
Wind soughed in the eaves, an ancient voice.
In the boughs of one of the backyard cherry trees, an owl hooted.
At last Ellen said, “I love you too, but sometimes I want to kick your ass.”
I was angry with her because I felt that she was not being fair, that she was allowing her least admirable emotions to overrule her reason. Now, many years later, I would give anything to hear her say that she wanted to kick my ass, and I’d bend over with a smile.
* * *
From the cradle, my son, Benny, was taught that God did not exist under any name or in any form, and that religion was the refuge of weak-minded people who did not have the courage to face the universe on its own terms. I would not permit Benny to be baptized, for in my view that ceremony was a primitive initiation rite by which the child would be inducted into a cult of ignorance and irrationality.
Ellen—my wife, Benny’s mother—had been raised as a Methodist and still was stained (as I saw it) by lingering traces of faith. She called herself an agnostic, unable to go further and join me in the camp of the atheists. I loved her so much that I was able to tolerate her equivocation on the subject. Nevertheless, I had nothing but scorn for others who could not face the fact that the universe was godless and that human existence was nothing more than a biological accident.
I despised all who bent their knees to humble themselves before an imaginary lord of creation: all the Methodists and Lutherans and Catholics and Baptists and Mormons and Jews and others. They claimed many labels but in essence shared the same sick delusion.
My greatest loathing was reserved, however, for those who had once been clean of the disease of religion, rational men and women, like me, who had slipped off the path of reason and fallen into the chasm of superstition. They were surrendering their most precious possessions—their independent spirit, self-reliance, intellectual integrity—in return for half-baked, dreamy promises of an afterlife with togas and harp music. I was more disgusted by the rejection of their previously treasured secular enlightenment than I would have been to hear some old friend confess that he had suddenly developed an all-consuming obsession for canine sex and had di
vorced his wife in favor of a German-shepherd bitch.
Hal Sheen, my partner with whom I had founded Fallon and Sheen Design, had been proud of his atheism too. In college we were best friends, and together we were a formidable team of debaters whenever the subject of religion arose; inevitably, anyone harboring a belief in a supreme being, anyone daring to disagree with our view of the universe as a place of uncaring forces, any of that ilk was sorry to have met us, for we stripped away his pretensions to adulthood and revealed him for the idiot child that he was. Indeed, we often didn’t even wait for the subject of religion to arise but skillfully baited fellow students who, to our certain knowledge, were believers.
Later, with degrees in architecture, neither of us wished to work with anyone but each other, so we formed a company. We dreamed of creating brawny yet elegant, functional yet beautiful buildings that would delight and astonish, that would win the admiration of not only our fellow professionals but the world. And with brains, talent, and dogged determination, we began to attain some of our goals while we were still very young men. Fallon and Sheen Design, a wunderkind company, was the focus of a revolution in design that excited university students as well as longtime professionals.
The most important aspect of our tremendous success was that our atheism lay at the core of it, for we consciously set out to create a new architecture that owed nothing to religious inspiration. Most laymen are not aware that virtually all the structures around them, including those resulting from modern schools of design, incorporate architectural details originally developed to subtly reinforce the rule of God and the place of religion in life. For instance, vaulted ceilings, first used in churches and cathedrals, were originally intended to draw the gaze upward and to induce, by indirection, contemplation of Heaven and its rewards. Underpitch vaults, barrel vaults, grain vaults, fan vaults, quadripartite and sexpartite and tierceron vaults are more than mere arches; they were conceived as agents of religion, quiet advertisements for Him and for His higher authority. From the start, Hal and I were determined that no vaulted ceilings, no spires, no arched windows or doors, no slightest design element born of religion would be incorporated into a Fallon and Sheen building. In reaction we strove to direct the eye earthward and, by a thousand devices, to remind those who passed through our structures that they were born of the earth, not children of any God but merely more intellectually advanced cousins of apes.
Hal’s reconversion to the Roman Catholicism of his childhood was, therefore, a shock to me. At thirty-seven, when he was at the top of his profession, when by his singular success he had proven the supremacy of unoppressed, rational man over imagined divinities, he returned with apparent joy to the confessional, humbled himself at the communion rail, dampened his forehead and breast with so-called holy water, and thereby rejected the intellectual foundation on which his entire adult life, to that point, had been based.
The horror of it chilled my heart, my marrow.
For taking Hal Sheen from me, I despised religion more than ever. I redoubled my efforts to eliminate any wisp of religious thought or superstition from my son’s life, and I was fiercely determined that Benny would never be stolen from me by incense-burning, bell-ringing, hymn-singing, self-deluded, mush-brained fools. When he proved to be a voracious reader from an early age, I carefully chose books for him, directing him away from works that even indirectly portrayed religion as an acceptable part of life, firmly steering him to strictly secular material that would not encourage unhealthy fantasies. When I saw that he was fascinated by vampires, ghosts, and the entire panoply of traditional monsters that seem to intrigue all children, I strenuously discouraged that interest, mocked it, and taught him the virtue and pleasure of rising above such childish things. Oh, I did not deny him the enjoyment of a good scare, because there’s nothing essentially religious in that. Benny was permitted to savor the fear induced by books about killer robots, movies about the Frankenstein monster, and other threats that were the work of man. It was only monsters of satanic and spiritual origins that I censored from his books and films, because belief in things satanic is merely another facet of religion, the flip side of God worship.
I allowed him Santa Claus until he was seven, though I had a lot of misgivings about that indulgence. The Santa Claus legend includes a Christian element, of course. Good Saint Nick and all that. But Ellen was insistent that Benny would not be denied that fantasy. I reluctantly agreed that it was probably harmless, but only as long as we scrupulously observed the holiday as a purely secular event having nothing to do with the birth of Jesus. To us, Christmas was a celebration of the family and a healthy indulgence in materialism.
In the backyard of our big house in Bucks County, Pennsylvania, grew a pair of enormous, long-lived cherry trees, under the branches of which Benny and I often sat in milder seasons, playing checkers or card games. Beneath those boughs, which already had lost most of their leaves to the tugging hands of autumn, on an unusually warm day in early October of his seventh year, as we were playing Uncle Wiggly, Benny asked if I thought Santa was going to bring him lots of stuff that year. I said it was too early to be thinking about Santa, and he said that all the kids were thinking about Santa and were starting to compose want lists already. Then he said, “Daddy, how’s Santa know we’ve been good or bad? He can’t watch all us kids all the time, can he? Do our guardian angels talk to him and tattle on us, or what?”
“Guardian angels?” I said, startled and displeased. “What do you know about guardian angels?”
“Well, they’re supposed to watch over us, help us when we’re in trouble, right? So I thought maybe they also talk to Santa Claus.”
Only months after Benny was born, I had joined with like-minded parents in our community to establish a private school guided by the principles of secular humanism, where even the slightest religious thought would be kept out of the curriculum. In fact, our intention was to ensure that, as our children matured, they would be taught history, literature, sociology, and ethics from an anticlerical viewpoint. Benny had attended our preschool and, by that October of which I write, was in second grade of the elementary division, where his classmates came from families guided by the same rational principles as our own. I was surprised to hear that in such an environment he was still subjected to religious propagandizing.
“Who told you about guardian angels?”
“Some kids.”
“They believe in these angels?”
“Sure. I guess.”
“Do they believe in the tooth fairy?”
“Sheesh, no.”
“Then why do they believe in guardian angels?”
“They saw it on TV.”
“They did, huh?”
“It was a show you won’t let me watch.”
“And just because they saw it on TV, they think it’s true?”
Benny shrugged and moved his game piece five spaces along the Uncle Wiggly board.
I believed then that popular culture—especially television—was the bane of all men and women of reason and goodwill, not least of all because it promoted a wide variety of religious superstitions and, by its saturation of every aspect of our lives, was inescapable and powerfully influential. Books and movies like The Exorcist and television programs about guardian angels could frustrate even the most diligent parent’s attempts to raise his child in an atmosphere of untainted rationality.
The unseasonably warm October breeze was not strong enough to disturb the game cards, but it gently ruffled Benny’s fine brown hair. Wind mussed, sitting on a pillow on his redwood chair in order to be at table level, he looked so small and vulnerable. Loving him, wanting the best possible life for him, I grew angrier by the second; my anger was directed not at Benny but at those who, intellectually and emotionally stunted by their twisted philosophy, would attempt to propagandize an innocent child.
“Benny,” I said, “listen, there are no guardian angels. They don’t exist. It’s all an ugly lie told by people who want to
make you believe that you aren’t responsible for your own successes in life. They want you to believe that the bad things in life are the result of your sins and are your fault, but that all the good things come from the grace of God. It’s a way to control you. That’s what all religion is—a tool to control and oppress you.”
He blinked at me. “Grace who?”
It was my turn to blink. “What?”
“Who’s Grace? You mean Mrs. Grace Keever at the toy shop? What tool will she use to press me?” He giggled. “Will I be all mashed flat and on a hanger when she’s done pressing me? Daddy, you sure are silly.”
He was only a seven-year-old boy, after all, and I was solemnly discussing the oppressive nature of religious belief as if we were two intellectuals drinking espresso in a coffeehouse. Blushing at the realization of my own capacity for foolishness, I pushed aside the Uncle Wiggly board and struggled harder to make him understand why believing in such nonsense as guardian angels was not merely innocent fun but was a step toward intellectual and emotional enslavement of a particularly pernicious sort. When he seemed alternately bored, confused, embarrassed, and utterly baffled—but never for a moment enlightened—I grew frustrated, and at last (I am now ashamed to admit this) I made my point by taking Santa Claus away from him.
Suddenly it seemed clear to me that by allowing him to indulge in the Santa myth, I’d laid the groundwork for the very irrationality that I was determined to prevent him from adopting. How could I have been so misguided as to believe that Christmas could be celebrated entirely in a secular spirit, without risk of giving credence to the religious tradition that was, after all, the genesis of the holiday. Now I saw that erecting a Christmas tree in our home and exchanging gifts, by association with such other Christmas paraphernalia as manger scenes on church lawns and trumpet-tooting plastic angels in department-store decorations, had generated in Benny an assumption that the spiritual aspect of the celebration had as much validity as the materialistic aspect, which made him fertile ground for tales of guardian angels and all the other rot about sin and salvation.
Under the boughs of the cherry trees, in an October breeze that was blowing us slowly toward another Christmas, I told Benny the truth about Santa Claus, explained that the gifts came from his mother and me. He protested that he had evidence of Santa’s reality: the cookies and milk that he always left out for the jolly fat man and that were unfailingly consumed. I convinced him that Santa’s sweet tooth was in fact my own and that the milk—which I don’t like—was always poured down the drain. Methodically, relentlessly—but with what I thought was kindness and love—I stripped from him all of the so-called magic of Christmas and left him in no doubt that the Santa stuff had been a well-meant but mistaken deception.
He listened with no further protest, and when I was finished he claimed to be sleepy and in need of a nap. He rubbed his eyes and yawned elaborately. He had no more interest in Uncle Wiggly and went straight into the house and up to his room.
The last thing that I said to him beneath the cherry trees was that strong, well-balanced people have no need for imaginary friends like Santa and guardian angels. “All we can count on is ourselves, our friends, and our families, Benny. If we want something in life, we can’t get it by asking Santa Claus and certainly not by praying for it. We get it only by earning it—or by benefiting from the generosity of friends or relatives. There’s no reason ever to wish for or pray for anything.”
Three years later, when Benny was in the hospital and dying of bone cancer, I understood for the first time why other people felt a need to believe in God and seek comfort in prayer. Our lives are touched by some tragedies so enormous and so difficult to bear that the temptation to seek mystical answers to the cruelty of the world is powerful indeed.
Even if we can accept that our own deaths are final and that no souls survive the decomposition of our flesh, we often can’t endure the idea that our children, when stricken in youth, are also doomed to pass from this world into no other. Children are special, so how can it be that they too will be wiped out as completely as if they had never existed? I’ve seen atheists, though despising religion and incapable of praying for themselves, nevertheless invoke the name of God on behalf of their seriously ill children—only to realize, sometimes with embarrassment but often with deep regret, that their philosophy denies them the foolishness of petitioning for divine intercession.
When Benny was afflicted with bone cancer, I was not shaken from my convictions; not once during the ordeal did I put principles aside and blubber at God. I was stalwart, steadfast, stoical, determined to bear the burden by myself, though there were times when the weight bowed my head and when the very bones of my shoulders felt as if they would splinter and collapse under a mountain of grief.
That day in October of Benny’s seventh year, as I sat beneath the cherry trees and watched him return to the house to nap, I did not know how severely my principles and self-reliance would be tested in days to come. I was proud of having freed my son of his Christmas-related fantasies about Santa Claus, and I was pompously certain that the time would come when Benny, grown to adulthood, would eventually thank me for the rigorously rational upbringing that he had received.
* * *
When Hal Sheen told me that he had returned to the fold of the Catholic Church, I thought he was setting me up for a joke. We were having an after-work cocktail at a hotel bar near our offices, and I was under the impression that the purpose of our meeting was to celebrate some grand commission that Hal had won